Prediction of Talia Gibson [136th] vs Francesca Curmi [375th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W W W W
Form
W L W W W W W L W LHead To Head: Gibson 1 - 0 Curmi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gibson winning 2 and Curmi winning 1. The last match between Gibson and Curmi was at the W50 Nantes, 05-04-2025, Final, I.hard with Talia Gibson getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Talia Gibson | 1 |
| Francesca Curmi | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Talia Gibson
Player
Francesca Curmi
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:12:5 | Average Match Time | 2:12:5 |
| 65% (51/79) | 1st Serve % | 65% (66/101) |
| 59% (30/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (37/66) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (17/35) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 47% (47/101) | Return Points Win % | 42% (33/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Talia Gibson vs Francesca Curmi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibson 1 - 0 Curmi
Editorial Prediction:
In assessing the players' recent performance, it is imperative to consider their second serve effectiveness. Gibson displays a slight edge in this area, winning 41.82% of points on their second serve compared to Curmi’s 40.23%. This statistical insight correlates strongly with the accuracy of match predictions, providing a slight advantage to Gibson.
Examining return game statistics, Gibson again shows superior form, securing 51.34% of points on their opponent's second serve just ahead of Curmi’s 49.92%. Interestingly, when evaluating return statistics on first serves, Curmi comes out ahead, claiming 36.81% to Gibson’s 30.5%. This dimension is crucial for forecasting which player may be more favored in head-to-head competitions.
Under pressure situations, specifically break point defense, reveal that Curmi has a slight advantage by saving 45.9% of break points compared to Gibson’s 44.06%. This aspect is invaluable for in-game betting predictions, shedding light on their resilience during critical moments.
The overall performance trajectories over the past year show Gibson leading with 64.71% of matches won (W/L 44/24), in contrast to Curmi's 59.62% (W/L 31/21). This provides a broader perspective when envisioning the likely match outcome. In terms of surfaces, both excel on Hard courts; Gibson has a win percentage of 67% and Curmi impresses with 68%. Notably, Curmi also displays a stronger performance on Clay with a 57% win rate compared to Gibson’s 40%.
Analyzing their activity at different competitive levels, within the last year, Gibson has participated predominantly in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 69.09% of these engagements. Curmi's success rate in similar settings stands at 61.22%, supporting the inference of Gibson’s superior adaptability to this level of competition. Moreover, Gibson has faced tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 183.24, while Curmi’s opponents rank at an average of 239.04, suggesting that Gibson is accustomed to more challenging adversaries.
An additional variable in the predictive model is their performance in deciding sets, where Gibson substantially surpasses Curmi by winning 78% of such sets compared to Curmi’s 56%. This insight is particularly relevant for live in-match betting.
Break point conversion rates also favor Gibson, who successfully converts 45.26% of opportunities compared to Curmi’s 37.81%. This critical metric is indicative of potential shifts in momentum during matches.
In conclusion, while both players have demonstrated capable performances across various metrics, the majority of the statistical analysis points towards Gibson as the likely victor in this upcoming match. Their edge in competitiveness and ability to handle pressure effectively aligns with these findings, suggesting a favorable outcome in their favor.
Talia Gibson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Francesca Curmi
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Mia Pohankova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Veronika Podrez
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Lisa Zaar
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Talia Gibson
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Talia Gibson
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Ela Nala Milic
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
37
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Talia Gibson
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Talia Gibson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Francesca Curmi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Francesca Curmi
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Francesca Curmi
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Sofia Costoulas
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Haruka Kaji
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Mallaurie Noel
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Conny Perrin
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pieri
Player
Francesca Curmi
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
43%
(
13 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
53%
(
24 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Sara Milanese
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (151/85) | Win/Loss | 62% (169/104) |
| 62% (342/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (377/253) |
| 55% (2766/2284) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3177/2615) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 751 | Aces Total | 89 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 803 | Total Double Faults | 460 |
| 1:36:2 | Average Match Time | 1:24:47 |
| 383.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.23 |
| 64% (9988/15598) | 1st Serve % | 72% (10629/14787) |
| 66% (6596/9988) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (6165/10629) |
| 47% (2648/5609) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1867/4158) |
| 46% (890/1918) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1010/2006) |
| 45% (7115/15773) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7218/15072) |
| 64% (149/234) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (167/270) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 61% (36/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (25/48) |
| 47% (36/76) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (43/83) |
| 87% (148/129) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (165/142) |
| 13% (148/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (165/23) |
| 25% (88/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (108/26) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
